AAP and the Disagreements: A Former Supporter’s Perspective
As an involved former functionary of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), I have chosen to voice my disagreements with certain aspects of the party's approach and decisions. This article reflects my personal views and experiences, which may not fully represent the party's official stance.
Disagreeing with Certain AAP Policies and Actions
One of the things I completely disagree with is the selection of Rajya Sabha candidates who are not aligned with the AAP. This decision undermines the party's principles and seems to prioritize personal or political gains over the vision of the party. Additionally, the attempt to control other state units from the national office in Delhi, as exemplified in Punjab, often leads to division and ineffectiveness.
Another major disappointment is the transformation of a party that was once actively driven by volunteers into one that operates like a typical political party. This shift from a grassroots-driven movement to a centralized political structure has alienated many. Alongside this, the AAP's involvement in electoral campaigns where their candidates failed to contest the election on the issues of full statehood, such as the 2019 general election, further highlights a deviation from their original mission.
Issues with AAP's Recent Actions and Decision-Making
As an AAP volunteer, I have witnessed and have strong opinions on the party's recent actions. Playing the Dalit card in urban areas was a misstep that alienated a segment of the population that didn't resonate with such tactics. Similarly, there has been a significant shift towards a more Modi-like obsession, with Arvind Kejriwal often shadowing Modi's moves. This can be seen as an irritant to some members of the party who are passionate about the party's unique identity.
Internal democracy and party structure are also areas of concern. The party seems to lack the democratic spirit that was one of its founding bases. It has become more of a monarchy in disguise, with a strong authoritarian leadership that may hinder the growth of the party. This format may discourage many talented individuals from joining or contributing to the party unless there is a change in leadership or governance.
Specific Critiques and Recommendations
1. Internal Democracy and Leadership: - The party should focus on building a more democratic structure. - Leaders like Shanti Bhushan have left due to dissatisfaction with the current form, which does not reflect the initial ideals of the party. - The party needs to foster a culture where internal dissent and feedback are valued and acted upon.
2. Selection of Candidates: - There have been instances where the party has provided tickets to candidates who are perceived as subpar. This decision reflects a lack of discernment and accountability in the candidate selection process. - The party needs to be more rigorous in choosing candidates who can truly bring about change and have a strong track record of addressing issues effectively.
3. Promotion of Corruption: - Supporting corrupt individuals in elections, such as Lalu Yadav or Nitish Kumar, goes against the party's anti-corruption stance. - The party should adhere more closely to its core values and avoid alliances with or endorsements of corrupt figures.
4. Use of Funds and Advertisement Strategy: - The advertisement strategy, particularly the use of public signage and transport, has been criticized for being ineffective and wasteful. - The party should focus on more targeted and relevant messaging that specifically highlights the positive changes and policies they support.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while I remain neither in favor nor against AAP, it is clear that the party has several areas where it needs to improve. The current leadership should reflect on these issues and consider the long-term implications of their actions. AAP has the potential to be a significant force in Indian politics, but it must address these challenges to fulfill its promise of transformative governance.