Is Modi’s Call for LPG Subsidy Cancellation Justified Given MPs Enjoy Subsidies?
Personal Perspective
When Prime Minister Narendra Modi asks the general public to give up their LPG subsidy, it sparks debate. His argument is based on an advertisement suggesting that by giving up the subsidy, it can be redirected to another family in need. While the government could simply provide the benefits, this campaign aims to engage citizens directly.
The Current Political System and Practicality
Given the current political system, withdrawing facilities from ministers and MPs may not be practically possible. This is because such benefits are often tied to their roles in governance.
Prime Minister’s Example and Financial Responsibility
Prime Minister Modi is setting an example by leading a simple life, which is acknowledged by many. However, his call is more targeted towards affluent individuals who are willing to give up their subsidies. The government can manage to run an effective audio-visual campaign to reduce welfare costs. Over one million consumers have already surrendered their LPG subsidies after such a campaign.
Target Audience and Ethical Considerations
Without doubt, Prime Minister Modi intends for only those who can afford to pay market price to give up their subsidy. The audience for this ad is primarily upper middle and upper class individuals, not the middle class. The intention is to decrease welfare costs without affecting the middle class significantly.
Regarding MPs and subsidies, if they are honest, there is no problem. We need a system that supports MPs in working independently without financial pressures. This would allow them to focus on their duties more effectively.
The Financial Perspective
The prime reason behind this campaign is to increase government revenue. The LPG subsidy ad aims to save approximately a thousand crore, which has a significant impact on businesses supporting the government. The advertisement is designed to engage and manipulate public emotions, which is common in such marketing strategies.
Emotional Manipulation and Public Trust
When Indians are shown problems like poverty and unemployment, they often react emotionally. However, it’s crucial to think beyond emotional responses. The advertising company creating the ad is known for such emotional appeals. This is a business tactic to manipulate public opinion for financial gain.
In conclusion, while Prime Minister Modi’s intentions might be noble, the effectiveness and ethical implications of such a campaign are worth considering. Increasing transparency and trust in the system can help address these issues more sustainably.
Keywords: LPG subsidy, Modi's call, MPs subsidy, government transparency, public trust
Categories: Politics, Economy, Public Policy