The Trump Border Wall: Myths and Realities
Introduction
The Trump border wall has been a controversial topic since its inception. Often seen as both a symbol of his presidency and a central issue in discussions of national security, the reality of the border wall is much more complex. This article aims to dispel common myths and provide a comprehensive understanding of the Trump border wall and its ongoing implications.
Myth #1: The Wall Completely Fulfilled its Promises
Claims that the Trump border wall was a complete success in achieving its intended goals are misleading. Parts of the wall that were built have rusted, crumbled, and in some areas, holes have been created, which facilitated illegal crossings. Additionally, the wall, which was never completed, has been left to deteriorate, leading to its partial collapse. This indicates that the wall was never as effective or lasting as initially claimed.
Materials and labor for repairs are still ongoing, and the sections constructed under Trump continue to deteriorate due to neglect and the effects of the environment. The costs of maintaining and repairing the wall have continued to strain federal budgets.
Myth #2: The Wall was Funded and Built Without Contradiction
Another common myth is that the Trump administration fully funded and built the border wall without significant obstacles. In reality, the administration faced numerous challenges. Initially, Trump planned for a massive 2000-mile wall that would traverse various terrains, including mountains and rivers. The reality was far from this grand vision.
Some 450 miles were constructed during the Trump administration, and many more were paid for but left uncompleted. Due to the Republican-controlled Congress, Trump did manage to secure some funding, but it was often directed to other projects, such as military housing and education, rather than the wall. The actual funding for wall construction was around 13 billion dollars, and some of these funds were diverted from other approved projects.
Myth #3: The Wall Was Just a Public Relations Slogan
The notion that the wall was a mere public relations slogan, created to garner support at rallies, is also a mischaracterization. However, it is true that the idea for the wall was somewhat spontaneous. The phrase "make America great again" and the slogan "build the wall" became rallying cries before they became policy proposals. These slogans were not the work of professional engineers or experienced border security experts.
The wall was never a well-thought-out plan but rather a grandiose idea that captured the public's imagination. No serious engineers supported the vision of a 2000-mile wall that could overcome natural obstacles and effectively secure the border. The wall's effectiveness in terms of border security and drug trafficking reduction was always questionable.
Even with a functioning wall, experts agree that it would be ineffective in addressing the complexities of border security. The border wall fails to tackle the root causes of illegal immigration and drug trafficking, such as economic instability and demand for illegal substances in the U.S. The wall has, at best, marginal impact in these areas.
Biden's Approach to the Border Wall
Upon assuming office, the Biden administration reversed course, focusing on a more comprehensive approach to border security. This shift includes a renewed emphasis on infrastructure, technology, and community relations. The Biden government also recognizes the need for a balanced approach, leveraging partnerships with countries in the region to address root causes of migration and improve border management.
It is essential to note that while the wall was started under Trump, its completion or extension rests in the hands of subsequent administrations. Biden's decision to allow the wall to continue, albeit with modifications, reflects a pragmatic approach to border security issues.
Conclusion
The Trump border wall remains a contentious issue, with many myths and half-truths perpetuated. Understanding the complexities and realities behind its construction and impact is crucial for informed discourse on border security. As the situation continues to evolve, it is important that policymakers and the public remain informed and engaged in meaningful discussions about the best ways to address the challenges of border security.