Is Trump's Handling of the Attempted Assassination a Testament to True Leadership?
When evaluating a leader's actions, it's easy to point out faults and shortcomings. However, some actions are more about character and courage than about political affiliations or personal dislikes.
Recklessness and Narcissism
Joseph Biden once humorously remarked that it takes no bravery to get shot unless someone purposely puts themselves in the line of fire, which then requires courage to endure the aftermath. President Donald Trump, often criticized for his reckless behavior and narcissistic personality, did not dodge this test. His actions during the attempted assassination attempt at the Washington, D.C. rally in January 2023 showcase a blend of both.
recklessness and Narcissism
Throughout his career, Trump has been cited for his reckless behavior, often stemming from a deep-seated sense of entitlement. He was diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder, characterized by a grandiose sense of self-importance and a constant need for admiration.
This personality trait often manifests in risky and often dangerous behaviors, from the way he speaks to how he conducts himself in dangerous situations. His willingness to take risks, even when they are fraudulent or immoral, is a hallmark of his leadership style.
The Fragility of Trump's Ego
Donald Trump's public image is that of a man who is unshakable and unbreakable in the face of adversity. However, beneath this tough exterior lies a fragile ego, a common trait among many narcissists. This fragility is compounded by his deep-seated need to be the best, a quality that drives him to take extreme actions.
Fragility and Need to Be the Best
This need to be the absolute best at everything he does, including his public appearances, has led him to make bold and even reckless decisions. It was this combination of fragility and the drive to be the best that led to his rise to power, making him someone who is willing to take enormous risks, even if they are morally questionable.
However, his inability to serve in the military, which he famously did not do for "personal reasons," highlights a different form of courage. Military service requires bravery in a way that Trump was not willing to show. It involves risks that he clearly did not want to face, including the potential for lifelong injuries or even death.
A Test of True Courage
Following the January 2023 attack, Trump did not hide. Instead, he faced the crowd with a sense of bravery, understanding that the people's safety was at risk. His move to the podium and his response to the situation were a testament to a different kind of courage—one that is often overlooked in the face of his other, more controversial actions.
The incident at the rally was not merely a test of bravery; it was a test of how a leader handles adversity. Trump's actions demonstrated a resolve to protect his supporters and counteract the perceived attack on his supporters.
Leadership vs. Public Persona
While Trump's public persona is often criticized for its bluntness, egotism, and flip-flopping, his actions during the attempted assassination provide a different view of his character. He stood up, faced the threat, and even went back to the rally to address the crowd.
Trump's behavior stands in stark contrast to the response of Kamala Harris, the vice president. Her inappropriate laughter in the face of such a serious situation fails to meet the standards expected of a leader.
Final Thoughts
Despite his many flaws, Trump's response to the attempted assassination can be seen as a display of courage and leadership. He did not hide from the situation, unlike some who would have preferred to avoid the attention and potential danger. His street smarts and determination under pressure are qualities that define a leader in crisis.
While personal and political differences will always exist, it's important to recognize moments when leaders show true courage. Trump, despite his many shortcomings, demonstrated a level of bravery that is often overlooked in his public persona.