Why Gas Cans Are So Complicated and Difficult to Use
The struggle with using gas cans is a common complaint among homeowners, mechanics, and anyone who frequently needs to carry fuel. Despite the numerous regulations put in place for safety, the result has been gas cans that are more problematic than helpful. From conflicting DOT, OSHA, and EPA regulations to overly complicated features, gas cans are designed with safety in mind but end up being a frustrating experience. Let's dive into why these containers are so complicated and hard to use.
Regulations Piling On
Several regulatory bodies govern the design and use of gas cans, each with its own set of rules. These include the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). While these regulations aim to improve safety, they often conflict with one another, leading to gas cans that are more restrictive than functional.
Spark Screens
One of the most criticized features of modern gas cans is the spark screen. This screen is designed to prevent fires from igniting gasoline vapor inside the container. However, the placement of such screens in gas cans often restricts airflow and makes the cans harder to use. The question arises: why are people pouring fuel into containers where flames can ignite the fumes? Despite this, the presence of spark screens adds an extra layer of difficulty to safely handling and using gas cans.
Spring Loaded Valves and Venting
Spring loaded valves are another feature meant to prevent explosions by allowing pressure to vent. However, these valves are often difficult to operate, making it harder to pour fuel without spills or leaks. The tension in these valves and the complex sealing mechanisms add unnecessary levels of complexity, which users often find frustrating.
Fume Control
Fume control systems are intended to exchange vapor from the tank back into the can while maintaining a closed system. The idea behind this is to reduce the risk of fire and explosion. Unfortunately, these systems often do not work as intended, leading to unnecessary complications in fueling and maintenance.
Features and Their Impact
While the intentions behind these features are noble, their practical impact can be detrimental. The combination of spark screens, spring loaded valves, and fume control systems often makes gas cans more difficult to use than necessary. Compliance with all these regulations can create cans that are cumbersome and prone to spills, especially for those not familiar with the complex interactions between these features.
Spillage and Inefficiency
For many users, getting gas cans to pour fuel without spilling is more challenging than it should be. A compliant can that I have is a nightmare to use. I spill more fuel using that can than any other because of the 'features.' This is largely due to the complicated mechanisms that these features introduce. Fortunately, for tasks that require larger fuel intake, such as filling a tractor, I can simply remove the nozzle and pour directly into the vehicle's fuel port, bypassing the need for the can altogether.
Alternatives and Workarounds
Fortunately, there are alternatives to standard gas cans that help ease the pain of using them. Replacement spouts that lack these features can be easily installed on many cans. These spouts are designed to be user-friendly, allowing for efficient and safe fueling without the complications of compliance.
Skipping the Compliance
Many users simply opt to use older cans, which are often simpler to use and provide greater convenience. While compliance with current regulations may seem necessary, the practical benefits of using older, more user-friendly designs can outweigh the need for regulatory compliance.
Another alternative is to use large 35-gallon carts, which are designed to move large quantities of fuel. These carts come with a smooth operating pump and a convenient spout. However, they can be cumbersome to handle, especially when filled to capacity. Lifting 210 lbs (95 kilos) is no small feat, and managing the liquid in the can can make it harder to move. Ideally, these carts work best when placed on the ground and filled or emptied in that position.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the regulatory framework surrounding gas cans is a double-edged sword. While the intent is to improve safety, the resulting complications often hinder efficient and safe use. Users frequently find these cans to be frustrating and hard to manage. Whether through using older cans, installing simpler spouts, or opting for large fuel delivery carts, there are always alternatives available that provide a more practical and user-friendly experience. Whether it's simplifying the design or finding alternative storage solutions, the key is to balance safety with usability to enhance the overall experience of working with gas cans.